Comments on: C#: Poisoning the well /rants/c-poisoning-the-well/ sealed abstract class drew {} Sun, 27 Mar 2016 22:51:38 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.4.15 By: Sealed Abstract » Why the GPL sucks /rants/c-poisoning-the-well/comment-page-1/#comment-197 Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:10:18 +0000 /?p=446#comment-197 […] stirring the pot against the free and open-source Mono project with FUD that’s been debunked again and again, prompting even Microsoft to weigh in, and yet Stallman still goes on in his own little […]

]]>
By: Drew Crawford /rants/c-poisoning-the-well/comment-page-1/#comment-196 Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:41:00 +0000 /?p=446#comment-196 True. My point was that there’s certainly no patent threat to Mono. Microsoft’s interactions have only been positive.

]]>
By: James /rants/c-poisoning-the-well/comment-page-1/#comment-195 Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:59:33 +0000 /?p=446#comment-195 I’m pretty sure that’s not the only public interaction between Microsoft and Mono. There’s this, for a start:
http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Windows/Microsofts-Muglia-Talks-Longhorn-Novell-and-Java/1/

Are’t there a number of Microsoft employees who have contributed code to Mono, also?

]]>